Pope-check: Where does Pope Francis really stand?

Is Pope Francis a breath of fresh air, throwing Vatican windows wide open to the world again, heralding a new day for the Catholic Church? Or is he a cafeteria progressive, choosing only certain social issues — environment, refugees, the poor — and maintaining a hard line on others —acceptance of LGBT people, role of women, anything to do with sexuality?

I left the church over Pope Benedict XVI — Joseph Ratzinger’s anti-gay and anti-woman rhetoric. Pew Research says that puts me in a not-very-select group: just over half of all adults who were raised Catholic have left the church at some point. Some return, most don’t, but “American Catholics – both in and out of the church – are still like a family, just one where not everyone is living under the same roof.”

Now there’s a new pope in town, and he sounds a whole lot different. Pope Francis —Jorge Mario Bergoglio uses the language of liberation theology that sustained me (and a lot of other people) from the 1970s onward. Liberation theology and theologians were anathema to Ratzinger, during his years as cardinal and pope. Many priests who embraced liberation theology were subjected to church discipline and forced out of the priesthood. Priests, nuns and laypeople who followed its preferential option for the poor were assassinated by right-wing regimes during the Latin American civil wars of the 1970s and 1980s. Pope Francis has embraced liberation theology’s preferential option for the poor:

“In the present condition of global society where injustices abound and growing numbers of people are deprived of basic human rights and considered expendable, the principle of the common good immediately becomes logically and inevitable a summons to solidarity and to a preferential option for the poorest of our brothers and sisters.” (Laudato si, 158)

During the 1980s, Dominican priest and theologian Matthew Fox espoused a creation-centered theology that looked at the beauty and goodness of creation, including human beings. He focused on original blessing rather than original sin. Fox was expelled from the church in the 1990s by then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who condemned Fox’s creation-centered spirituality.

Pope Francis takes a different stance. In Laudato si, Pope Francis writes that, “Rather than a problem to be solved, the world is a joyful mystery to be contemplated with gladness and praise.” Later in the encyclical, he writes:

“In the first creation account in the Book of Genesis, God’s plan includes creating humanity. After the creation of man and woman, “God saw everything that he had made, and behold it was very good” (Gen 1:31). The Bible teaches that every man and woman is created out of love and made in God’s image and likeness (cf. Gen 1:26).” (Laudato si, 65)

Positive as this rhetoric is, Pope Francis hasn’t turned the church around. Maybe it’s like an ocean liner, too big to turn quickly. Or maybe the change is primarily rhetorical — like George Bush’s “kinder, gentler nation.”

Pope Benedict/Ratzinger condemned homosexual acts as “an intrinsic moral evil” and homosexuality as “an objective disorder.” Pope Francis sounded a kinder, gentler note, saying, “If someone is gay, who searches for the Lord and has goodwill, who am I to judge?” While U.S. conservatives pitched a hissy-fit over the inclusion of prominent gay guests among the 15,000 people at the White House reception for Pope Francis, the pope himself doesn’t seem to mind.

And yet — he has not indicated any change at all in church doctrine that homosexual acts are sinful, nor has he come anywhere near acknowledging same-sex marriage and families.

Pope Francis ended the three-year witch hunt of U.S. nuns launched and carried out under the direction of his predecessor. But he still maintains that the door is absolutely closed on the possibility of women as priests. On another crucial women’s issue, he maintains the church’s opposition to contraception, even as he endorses the idea of smaller families. While the pope has ordered a streamlining of the church’s annulment process, he still maintains the church’s non-recognition of divorce.

Thank God for a pope who recognizes the reality of global warming, calls for environmental protection, and advocates for the poor. But we are still waiting for a pope who will celebrate all God’s children — even those of us who are women, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgendered, intersex, and queer.


Filed under human rights

3 responses to “Pope-check: Where does Pope Francis really stand?

  1. Not having been brought up Catholic, and being atheistical, I have never understood the appeal of an institution so authoritarian, so filled with wrong policies and ideas. But it seems obvious that Bergoglio is a huge improvement over the inquisitor Ratzinger, and I suspect he is doing as much, moving as fast as he can. Is he personally wedded to many of worst policies of the church–celibacy, exclusion of females from the priesthood, and so on? I don’t know. But he’s better than any pope I would have expected to see in my lifetime.

    There are parallels to how I see Bernie Sanders. Yep, he’s very imperfect, he’s not strong on many issue I care about, but he’s way better on some crucial ones and no worse than any other candidate on the others.

    No leader can fight every battle, “die on every cross.”


  2. “Cafeteria progressive” – I love it! “Cafeteria Catholic” was a term I heard a lot at St. Agnes. I agree that the tenure of Pope Francis is both refreshing and dispiriting. His declaration of one special year when past abortions can be forgiven is such a quintessentially Catholic stunt. Martin Luther’s eyes would be rolling backwards out of his head.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s