Profile: Law professor Sarah Deer – now a MacArthur fellow – is a tireless advocate for Native victims of sexual assault [Published in Minnesota Women’s Press, 10/28/2014]
Volunteering at a rape crisis center in college changed Sarah Deer’s life. She worked with rape victims, heard their stories, accompanied them through trials. The crisis center was “grass-roots, tiny,” Deer says, but its influence was huge. Her work there set her on the road to becoming a lawyer and, this year, winning the prestigious MacArthur Foundation fellowship commonly known as a “genius grant.”
“I always really admired the theater of the courtroom,” she recalls, but she wanted to be a different kind of prosecutor, spending more time working with victims. In law school, she discovered that’s not the way the system works. “The prosecutor represents the government, doesn’t represent the victim. Maybe that’s a flaw in our system, but that’s the way it is. The victim is a witness, not the centerpiece of the case. The government is the centerpiece. … I saw the victim treated like any other piece of evidence. I understand that, but I couldn’t work in that way.”
Since becoming a lawyer, Deer has passionately – and effectively – advocated for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. A citizen of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, she has focused on the intersection of federal Indian Law and sexual violence against Native American women.
Deer explained in a 2005 article in the Suffolk University Law Review:
“Sexual assault law and legal reform is incomplete without a discussion about Federal Indian Law. There are three main reasons for this: Native American women suffer the highest rate of sexual assault in the United States, rape and sexual violence were historically used as weapons of war against indigenous peoples, and contemporary tribal governments have been deprived of the ability to prosecute many sex offenders.”
Deer said Sarah Jane Russell, director of the Lawrence, Kan., rape crisis center where she volunteered, and Bonnie Clairmont, victim advocacy specialist in the Tribal Law and Policy Institute’s Minnesota office, are two key mentors.
Deer makes crucial connections, says Clairmont. She cites Deer’s work on “Maze of Injustice,” a 2007 Amnesty International report that framed violence against Native women as part of “a legacy of widespread and egregious human rights abuses.”
In her work, says Clairmont, Deer helps to identify “the intersection between our historic trauma and all that oppression and how that relates to gender violence today … in a really thought-provoking, truthful way. That’s what I love about Sarah – she can put the truth out there, and risk a lot of things for herself.”
Reworking the law
In 2009, Deer and Colette Routel were hired to restart William Mitchell’s Indian Law program. Deer deeply appreciates William Mitchell’s commitment to that program, which includes two clinics. Deer directs the code writing clinic and Routel the public defender clinic for the Menominee Nation.
“Tribes are trying to update their laws to be relevant to their people,” Deer says. Many, though not all, tribes remain “stuck with these template laws that got handed to them. You’ve got marital rape exemptions in some of the tribal codes, because that’s what the state codes said at the time.”
Under Deer’s supervision, students look at the Indian nations’ law codes and recommend revisions.
“Imagine a blank slate,” says Deer. “You get to write rape law all over again. Get rid of all the baggage of European patriarchy and start again. With tribes, you have that opportunity. Just say we’ve got a blank slate. The state system has been a disaster for women, historically, so let’s not replicate that. But it’s really hard to think outside that box of ‘This is what a crime is, this is how you define and prosecute it.’ It’s exhilarating to be part of this. … The students are doing unique work and work that really matters.”
Deer’s heritage includes both teaching and outspoken advocacy. Her father taught high school, then went to law school and served as a state court judge in Kansas and as a Muscogee (Creek) Nation Supreme Court judge. Her mother was a teacher and her grandfather, Isaac Deer, was a teacher and a Kansas state legislator.
Routel describes Deer as having a “tireless commitment and a focus on people.”
She sees Deer as a “grass-roots kind of organizer,” eloquent in giving a voice to people who don’t have a voice. In the midst of this work, says Routel, Deer shows outstanding empathy: “Day to day, she’s the person I send any student to with a personal problem.”
Deer already has helped to gain passage of the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010 and the renewal of the Violence Against Women Act in 2013.
“When you’re working on federal legislative reform,” says Deer, “it takes sometimes generations. It takes such a long time to convince lawmakers that they need to change things.” Deer says she is not sure how she will use the MacArthur fellowship. At 41, she has a long professional life ahead, and time to build on her success in teaching and advocacy.
Violence against Native American women
Here are some statistics:
• 1 in 3 Native women will be sexually assaulted during her lifetime, compared with 1 in 5 women in the general population.
• 3 in 5 Native women will be victims of domestic violence.
• More than 70 percent of the assailants of Native women are non-Indian; overall, however, the vast majority of sexual assaults are intraracial (e.g., white attacker and white victim).
• 90 percent of Native women report being hit during rape, compared with 74 percent of women in the general population.
• Use of a weapon was reported in 34 percent of rapes of Native women, compared with 11 percent in all reported rapes.
• 50 percent of Native women report injuries in addition to rape, compared with 30 percent of the general population. Sources: “Criminal Justice in Indian Country” Sarah Deer, American Indian Law Review of the University of Oklahoma College of Law (2013); “Sovereignty of the Soul: Exploring the Intersection of Rape Law Reform and Federal Indian Law,” Deer, Suffolk University Law Review (2005), and “Maze of Injustice,” Amnesty International (2007).