Reopening the schools: whether and how

mgn_1280x960_80807p00-vuvckAlmost two-thirds of White parents who responded to a Minnesota Department of Education survey said they are comfortable sending their children back to school in September. A slim majority of Black parents said they were uncomfortable or not sure about sending their children back to school. Most Asian and Latinx parents responding to the survey also were uncomfortable or unsure.

Originally published in Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder

Are more Black parents actually uncomfortable about sending their children back to school in September? If so, why? And what does that say about whether and how schools should reopen?

The Department of Education survey was not a scientific or randomized poll. The vast majority—more than 80 percent—of 130,000 people answering the question were White parents. The state’s K-12 student population is only 64 percent White. Nonetheless, the caution that Black parents expressed in the survey is echoed in other surveys around the country.

Why would Black parents feel less comfortable about school reopening?

Black parents have more to fear from COVID-19. Across the country, Black people are hit with COVID-19 at almost three times the rate of White people. Black people suffer 62 coronavirus cases per 10,000 people, compared to 23 per 10,000 for White people. Latinx communities see 73 cases per 10,000 people.

In Hennepin County, the disparity is much worse: 146 cases per 10,000 Black people, compared to 27 per 10,000 for white people. Latinx and Asian people also suffer higher rates of coronavirus infection.

Data show children are less likely than adults to get COVID-19. When they get the disease, it is likely to be less severe. On the other hand, some significant cases of in-school outbreaks exist: Three teachers in an Arizona summer school were infected and one died. A single Israeli school reported 130 cases, and dozens of other schools reported infections that led to a second school shutdown there.

Reopening schools increases adults at risk of infection. Nationally, almost one in five teachers is 55 or older. Others have medical conditions that put them at risk, or vulnerable family members. Custodians, lunchroom workers, and others also will be exposed to children and to one another. Reopening schools multiplies the ways coronavirus can spread through the community.

The argument for reopening schools

Black students have been badly served by public schools in Minnesota. Educational disparities rank high on a long list of racial disparities in the state. Ironically, that may be an argument in favor of reopening those same schools.

Students suffer when schools are closed. On-line schooling is worse for most students, with “attendance” lagging and lack of in-person contact with teachers and with peers. Just over half the respondents to the Department of Education survey reported bad or very bad experiences with online learning this spring.

The American Association of Pediatrics cites negative educational and social impacts of school closing. They recommend reopening with safety measures in place.

Parents need schools, too. They need to work at paid jobs to maintain their families. They need to work at the unpaid jobs of parenting and keeping homes together. The added burden of providing the education and socialization that kids get in school is just too much.

Black parents are overrepresented in low-paying but essential jobs. Inflexible work schedules leave them less time for homework help. Low pay means less money to spend on educational resources, from speedy internet to books to tutoring.

How to reopen?

Planning for reopening raises huge questions. How can a high school that has 30 students in a classroom with 28 desks plan for social distancing? What happens with music classes, given that singing greatly increases virus transmission? What kind of rules govern bathroom breaks and hand-washing? Who responds to sick students in schools that do not have nurses?

CDC guidelines recommend strategies to decrease risk. Some of their recommendations: six feet of space between desks; face masks for everyone; one student per row on buses; extra cleaning and disinfecting everywhere; small groups at lunch time; limited sharing of electronic devices, books, and learning aids; daily health screening for everyone. The entire guidance document covers nine pages.

These changes cost money. Schools don’t have money to follow the guidelines. Logically, the federal government could provide emergency aid, as it did to airlines and other businesses. President Trump has a different idea. Instead of talking about reopening risks and resources, he ordered the CDC to change the guidelines.

Counting down to Labor Day

In Minnesota, schools have been ordered to prepare three plans for September: in-person learning for all students, or hybrid learning with strict social distancing and capacity limits, or distance learning only.

The Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) will announce its decision by the week of July 27. That decision could call for all schools in the state to follow the same scenario, or for different districts to follow different scenarios.

No plan will look like September 2019. In-person reopening might require additional locations to allow more space for social distancing. It might mean keeping groups of students together all day (cohorting). Hybrid learning could mean all students getting equal in-school time. Or it could mean prioritizing students who have special needs or who need extra help for in-school time.

Whatever plan is approved, the devil will be in the details of how each district, school, and classroom implements plans to protect students and the community.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “Reopening the schools: whether and how

  1. Barbara

    Wow! Two-thirds of parents are actually comfortable with sending their children back to school less than two months from now? (Personification alert) Even as the fickle virus lurks about, seeking the next juicy opportunity to attack humans? This seems to me like setting up a kind of kiddie buffet for COVID-19.
    So, how this works is that children have no choice and parents have two choices?
    (1) Parents will send their children off with thoughts and prayers that they will survive and those comfortable parents who go back to their jobs will not be freaking out about their kids; OR
    (2) The one-third of parents who are not comfortable with sending their children back to school will either continue to office at home for as long as their employers practice isolating, and/or they’ll lose said jobs, and/or they’ll lose their COVID monthly stipends.
    This seems to me a radical rock/hard place situation.
    Who are these comfortable parents? Enquiring mind wants to know. What’s that really about?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s